Being a visual and verbal chronologue of my peculiar life, foremost my research interests—death and the anatomical body—and travels and people I've met in pursuit of same; my collecting interests—fossils, postmortem photographs, weird news, and new acquisitions to my “museum”; and (reluctantly) my health, having been diagnosed with MS in 1990. "Satisfying my morbid curiosity and yours..."
Tuesday, October 15, 2013
Dimorphic digits
Archaeologist Dean Snow of Pennsylvania State University had an epiphany a decade ago while reading the work of British biologist John Manning. Manning had discerned that the hands of men and women were dimorphic, that they differed not just in size but in the relative lengths of their fingers compared to one another. The ring fingers of men tend to be longer than their index fingers, while those two fingers are about the same length on a woman's hand. Snow had the brilliant idea of applying that knowledge to ancient cave paintings that included hand stencils. He has now analyzed those at 8 cave sites in France and Spain and determined that 75% of the handprints were female. One of these was the El Castillo cave in Cantabria, Spain, in which the hand stencils of men (IMAGE ABOVE, LEFT) were far outnumbered by the hand stencils of women (IMAGE ABOVE, RIGHT). And with that, he has overturned long-held assumptions that the paintings – of game animals including bison, reindeer, horses, and woolly mammoths – were made by males to magically improve the success of their hunts. "In most hunter-gatherer societies, it's men that do the killing. But it's often the women who haul the meat back to camp, and women are as concerned with the productivity of the hunt as the men are. It wasn't just a bunch of guys out there chasing bison around."
Very cool application of biology to prehistoric art.
ReplyDelete